Science as organized scepticism.
نویسنده
چکیده
Real progress in understanding how the natural world works only truly began with the Enlightenment, with its guiding principle that the truth is to be found not by appeal to authority but by experimental tests and evidence. Unfortunately, but understandably, science is too often seen--in school, in university and especially on quiz shows--as certainty. In fact, science (including social sciences, engineering and medicine along with the more narrowly defined physical and biological sciences) is better seen as organized scepticism: a journey, over time, toward contingent understanding guided by experimental tests and sceptical questioning. Essentially all such journeys are beset by uncertainties of various kinds. This article sketches some of the consequent problems, particularly in relation to science advice, policy making and public engagement.
منابع مشابه
Climate of scepticism: US newspaper coverage of the science of climate change
This two-part study integrates a quantitative review of one year of US newspaper coverage of climate science with a qualitative, comparative analysis of media-created themes and frames using a social constructivist approach. In addition to an examination of newspaper articles, this paper includes a reflexive comparison with attendant wire stories and scientific texts. Special attention is given...
متن کاملWhat is climate change scepticism? Examination of the concept using a mixed methods study of the UK public
The holding of doubts about climate change is often referred to as ‘scepticism’. However, there has been a lack of clarity in previous work as to what exactly this scepticism comprises. We integrate data obtained from discussion groups and a nationally representative survey, to interrogate and refine the concept of climate change scepticism with respect to the views of members of the public. We...
متن کاملMorality, Rationality and Impartiality
Morality as somehow involving rationality and impartiality received classic expression in philosophy of Kant who frankly speaks of “rational and impartial spectator” in contemplating the universal law. The overall aim of this paper is to show (1) that the idea of morality implies rationality and this will be reached at in refuting the moral scepticism; but (2) it does not necessarily indicates ...
متن کاملPhilosophical ‘Intuitions’ and Scepticism about Judgement
1. What are called ‘intuitions’ in philosophy are just applications of our ordinary capacities for judgement. We think of them as intuitions when a special kind of scepticism about those capacities is salient. 2. Like scepticism about perception, scepticism about judgement pressures us into conceiving our evidence as facts about our internal psychological states: here, facts about our conscious...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences
دوره 369 1956 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011